Assessment of Morphological Diversity of Cuscuta Species based on Floral Morphology
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
The genus Cuscuta L. are obligate stem parasites, with long, multi- branched, modified thread like stem, attacking an extensive range of host plants. The Cuscuta species has cosmopolitan occurrence and are widely distributed throughout the temperate and tropical zones and colonizers diversity of habitats. Though, Cuscuta spp. is known to affect a number of crop and non-crop species globally, there is limited information on biology, ecosystem and farmers’ knowledge, existence species of diversity and threat to crop production. Furthermore, knowledge on the existence of variation within a species is a prerequisite for developing sustainable management strategies for Cuscuta spp. in a specified agrosystems as well as making decision for comprehensive management practices for the weed. Therefore, the aim of the study was to assess the morphological diversity of Cuscuta Species based on floral morphology in Uasin Gishu County, Kenya. The study was carried out in Uasin Gishu County across the six sub-counties using purposive and convenient sampling design. The study involved Morphological identification by examining Cuscuta species general appearance and the microscopic flower morphology examination. The morphology of the floral characters revealed distinct Cuscuta species from the accessions collected from Uasin Gishu County, Kenya. Concisely, the flowers were microscopically identified to the species level across all the samples and showed that the clusters contained of five petals, five sepals and five stamens. Cuscuta species showed tremendous diversity in Uasin Gishu County with Cuscuta reflexa exhibited wide distribution in the County. Characterization of species provide valuable information for extensive analysis and precise identification of Cuscuta and develop better management and utilization strategies.
Introduction
The genus Cuscuta (dodder) belong to the Convolvulaceae family, comprise of about 170–200 species of parasitic plants that are spread globally and occupy an extensive range of habitats, and concomitantly adapted to the diverse environmental conditions and niches (Yuncker, 1932; Costea, 2007; Costea & Stefanovi´c, 2009). Cuscuta is nearly cosmopolitan in distribution; occupying almost every continent, causing far-reaching damage to both crop and non-crop species worldwide (Dawsonet al., 1994; Kaiseret al., 2015). Approximately 15–20 Cuscuta species worldwide are known as pests that infest several crops globally and most of the countries regulations targets the whole genus on various quarantine lists (Lanini & Kogan, 2005; Costea & Tardif, 2006; Costea & Stefanovi´c, 2009). Cuscuta species causes harm due to parasitism; the most severe form of negative interaction in which one of the associates becomes a heterotroph living at the expense of the other, its host.
The lack of leaves, clustered or short racemes of flowers, corollas with five fimbriate scales, presence of haustoria, and acotyledonous embryo make the genus Cuscuta clearly unique from other Convolvulaceae genera (Stefanovićet al., 2007). Due to the highly diminished or almost missing vegetative organs (roots, leaves, and stems), as well as the tiny floral organs, Cuscuta species are particularly difficult to classify. Due to their co-growth with the corolla tube, the stamens are equal in number to the corolla lobes. The ovary is bilocular and contains 2–4 ovules. The two styles may stand alone or be fused together, and the stigmas may be capitate, spherical, or extended. The fruit is a conical, globular, or flattened capsule with 2–4 tiny seeds that is irregularly dehiscent or indehiscent. (Wrightet al., 2012; Riviere & Riviere, 2013; Olszewskiet al., 2020). Numerous studies on seed (Khalik Abdel, 2006; Olszewskiet al., 2020), pollen (Welsh Mark & C., 2010; Wrightet al., 2012), stigma (Mishra, 2009) and infrastaminal scales (Riviere & Riviere, 2013) and fruit of Cuscuta species and the overall diversity have reported on the evolution, morphology features, and microscopic assessment.
The knowledge of genetic diversity’s scope, and description is an important informative tool for the detection of duplicates, effective extension services and better characterization for further management strategies to be put in place. Morphological characterization is the first step in description and classification of genetic resources of any plant species. The study was however, carried out to comprehend the thorough Cuscuta species-based examination of morphological characteristics in Uasin Gishu County.
Materials and Methods
Study Area
The study survey was carried out in Uasin Gishu county located in Western part of Kenya across the six sub-counties namely; Turbo, Kesses, Moiben, Soy, Kapseret and Ainabkoi to understand the diversity of Cuscuta species. Agriculture is the chief economic activity in the County which is dominated by mixed farming systems supporting over 80% of the rural population’s household income and food security. The County has a total population of 1,163,186 and measures approximately, 3,392.2 km2 (Kenya National Beaureu of Statistics (KNBS), 2010). Uasin-Gishu County borders Elgeyo Marakwet County to the East, Trans-Nzoia County to the North, Kericho County to the South, Nandi County to the South West and Kakamega County to the North West (Government of Kenya (GoK), 2012). The County has an average altitude of above 2000 m above sea level (masl), bi-modal rainfall (long rains starting from mid-March to late May and short rains starts from mid-October to late December) and temperature range of 8.4°C–27°C. The average rainfall in the County is between 500–2600 mm per annum. The soil type is rhodic ferralsol (UNESCO, 1977).
Sampling Design
The study design was purposive and convenient sampling across the six sub-counties in Uasin Gishu County. The study involved Morphological identification by examining Cuscuta species general appearance and the microscopic flower morphology examination.
Microscopic Identification
The flower samples were also collected from natural populations in August 2020 to March 2021 for microscopic analysis. Reproductive morphological observations, flowers and seeds were examined using a stereomicroscope (Olympus SZX16; Tokyo, Japan). Ten flowers per sample were analyzed. Morphological identification was executed according to Olszewskiet al. (2020) and Yuncker (1932) modified descriptor. Briefly, flowers were either used immediately after collection or rehydrated before microscopy. The observation and examination of different parts of a full flower (sepals, petals, gynoecium and androecium) were also done and photographed. Thereafter, carefully dissected and photographed with focus given to specific areas such as the gynoecia, number of parts, fusion (or lack of) of the styles as well as the size and shape of stigmas. Ovaries were also dissected, then the number, size and color of ovules observed and photographed.
Data Collection and Analysis
Data was collected on morphological traits stem color (yellow, orange or purple), stem twinning (clockwise or anticlockwise) and flower color (white to pink or yellow to cream). The data was analyzed and reported as percentage and number of Cuscuta species.
Results and Discussion
The morphological characters and microscopic anatomical observations of Cuscuta species showed tremendous diversity in Uasin Gishu County (Fig. 1). Cuscuta species is found distributed across the world with enormous species diversity in tropical and sub-tropical regions and reported to colonize an extensive variety of hosts across several environments (Lanini & Kogan, 2005; Hwanget al., 2013; Kumariet al., 2017). The Cuscuta species showed the anticlockwise stem twinning of the host plant attachment. The twining induction response to the host plant has been reported to be influenced through far-red and blue lights which together with tactile pressure induce haustorial formation (Tadaet al., 1996a; Furuhashiet al., 2011) growth toward light sources parasitizing potential host plants.
Fig. 1. Morphology of the Cuscuta species (a-c, h, i) Cuscuta reflexa (a) species, (b) flowers, (c, h, i) anthers, (d-f) Cuscuta campestris (d) species, (e) flowers (f) capsule, (g-i) Cuscuta Kilimanjari species.
The morphology of the floral characters revealed 3 distinct Cuscuta species from the accessions collected from Uasin Gishu County, Kenya (Table I; Fig. 1). Succinctly, flowers were microscopically identified to the species level across all the samples and showed that the clusters contained of five petals, five sepals and five stamens. The presences of five petals that are connected with each other by bridges of the developing filaments of the stamens and a long corolla- filament tube have been reported (Prenneret al., 2002; Sharma & Kapoor, 2014).
Character | Cuscuta reflexa | Cuscuta campestries | Cuscuta kilimanjari |
---|---|---|---|
Stems | Branched, light brown to dark brown, thick and succulent stem | Branched, thin slender, green to yellow-brown | Branched, purple thick succulent stem |
Stem color | Greenish yellow | Yellowish orange | Purplish |
Flowers | Large, white to cream, arranged in paniculate cymes, pedicellate, bracts leaf- like | Small white, usually of cymose clusters, actinomorphic | Large, white |
Style | Single thick and short | 2 separate linear and slender | Short |
Stigma | 2 elongated and unequal | Capitate or rounded, brown | Round |
Calyx lobes | Five, fleshy, margin scarious, rounded, ovate-obtuse, deeply divided, overlapping at the base | Five, obtuse, 5, oval to orbicular | Five |
Corolla lobes | Five, ivory white, obtuse, upright spreading, scales scarious | Triangular, oblong- elliptical | Five |
Ovules | Four oblong and elliptical | Four, triangular or ovoid; capsule, circumscissile; | Four and oblong |
Ovaries | Four white ovules different sizes, conical | Globular, fleshy, brown | |
Stamens | Five, Linear filaments, fused | Five | Five |
Anthers | Five, fused, oblong, thick, | Five | Five |
Capsule | Brown | Globose and membranous | Oblong |
The study reported that the stem color of Cuscuta species varied from greenish-yellow being reported in 90%, orange (8%) and purple (2%) while majority the flower color was yellow to cream (90%). Generally, the observation indicated that young Cuscuta stem appeared green in color while older mature stems appeared yellow. The green stem color in the young Cuscuta species or the seedling stage shows the existence of chlorophyll, though it lacks roots and cannot absorb water by themselves, despite the genus being classified as holoparasitic. The Cuscuta green color can turn into orange or purple after parasitization, highlighting that plant gains energy from a host and does not need to photosynthesize (Furuhashiet al., 2011).
The morphological characters of the three distinct Cuscuta species; C. reflexa (Kumariet al., 2017; Verma & Yadav, 2018) C. campestris (Costea & Tardif, 2006; Mukhtar Irum, 2011; CABI, 2016) and C. Kilimanjari are described in Table I and Fig. 1 (Welsh Mark & C., 2010; Costeaet al., 2021). Cuscuta reflexa showed large flowers with a single thick and short style, 2 elongated stigmas, and ovaries that contained 4 white ovules, of different sizes (Fig. 1). The stem habit showed complete twining to the parasite and develop haustoria at the point of contact with the host with the stamens equals to the corolla lobe numbers. The flowers appear clusters as solitary or in racemose and are small pentamerous. The sepals are five and appear fused, five petals that are united and five stamens that are epipetalous with diverse sizes. The style appears very much reduced with two medially placed carpels showing axile placentation stigma (Sharma & Kapoor, 2014).
Cuscuta campestris comprised slender, threadlike yellow to orange stems (Fig. 1). Flowers were small, and white, approximately 2 mm in diameter, with greenish-yellow capsules that appeared in dense cymose clusters. Calyx lobes were obtuse, or rather acute, whereas corolla lobes were triangular. The stamens were shorter than the lobes, two separate slender styles, with globose stigmas that did not split at the base and four ovules were present (Fig. 1).
Cuscuta Kilimanjari species was not well distributed across Uasin Gishu County but was found along the forested mountain areas. This species had thick, coarse and purple vines with pale white flowers while the stamens were shorter than the lobes, with short and thick filaments. The styles were teo separate short and thick with white stigmas, displaying purple spots in the ovaries (Figs. 1a–i) (Sharma & Kapoor, 2014).
The Cuscuta species were diverse with C. reflexa exhibiting the widest climatic range. The preference towards a wide environmental conditions is probably related to the cycle of dormancy undergone by the seeds in the soil (Costea & Tardif, 2006). The ecological preferences for temperature and light are recognized for the germination and seedling phases, and are virtually unknown for the parasitizing stage. The flowering periods for the three Cuscuta species were noted to happen at different times of the year. The flowering time and the survival on the host plant have been shown to be influenced by the appropriate host, temperate, humidity, as well as the movement of hormones responsible for flowering and fruit formation in the host (Tadaet al., 1996b; Mishra, 2009). Cuscuta reflexa was widely distributed and displayed abundant growth with fast spreading habit and mainly affects woody trees and shrubs. while, Cuscuta campestris indulges herbaceous hosts, while C. kilimanjari typically parasitizes shrubs and softer parts of trees (Costeaet al., 2012; Sharma & Kapoor, 2014). Cuscuta campestris and C. kilimanjari exhibited narrow range of distribution and restricted mainly to isolated places in Uasin Gishu County mainly in the grassing fields as well as the forested area, respectively.
Conclusion
Cuscuta species showed tremendous diversity in Uasin Gishu County with Cuscuta reflexa exhibiting wide distribution. The morphological variations of the floral morphology are worthy to be taken into account, because it gives us a better understanding of the genetic diversity and easier management strategies.
References
-
CABI. (2016). Edited by participants from Ethiopia and Tanzania at a workshop in Nairobi, F. 2016. Cuscuta Campestris, 254(Issue February).
Google Scholar
1
-
Costea, M. (2007). Onward. Digital atlas of Cuscuta (Convolvulaceae). https://www.wlu.ca/page.php?grp_id=2147&p=8968. [accessed 13 April 2009].
Google Scholar
2
-
Costea, M., Felger, R. S., Austin, D. F., Devender, T. R. V., & Sánchezescalante, J. J. (2012). Conolvulaceae of Sonora, Mexico. II: Cuscuta. Journal of Botany Research Institute Texas, 6(2), 529–550.
Google Scholar
3
-
Costea, M., Soares, S., Simão-bianchini, R., Simões, A. R. G., & Stefanovi´ c, S. (2021). Notes on the systematics of Cuscuta sect. Subulatae (subg. Grammica) with the description of Cuscuta mantiqueirana, a new species from Brazil. PhytoKeys, 44, 27–44. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.184.69037.
Google Scholar
4
-
Costea, M., & Stefanovi´c, S. (2009). Cuscuta jepsonii (Convolvulaceae): An invasive weed or an extinct endemic? American Journal of Botany, 96, 1744–1750.
Google Scholar
5
-
Costea, M., & Tardif, F. J. (2006). The biology of Canadian weeds. 133. Cuscuta campestris Yuncker, C. gronovii Willd. ex Schult., C. umbrosa Beyr. ex Hook., C. epithymum (L.) L. and C. epilinum Weihe. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 86(1), 293–316.
Google Scholar
6
-
Dawson, J. H., Musselman, L. J., Wolswinkel, P., & Dörr, I. (1994). Biology and control of Cuscuta. Rev. Weed Science, 6, 265–317.
Google Scholar
7
-
Furuhashi, T., Furuhashi, K., & Weckwerth, W. (2011). The parasitic mechanism of the holostemparasitic plant Cuscuta. Journal of Plant Interactions, 6(4), 207–219. https://doi.org/10.1080/17429145.2010.541945.
Google Scholar
8
-
Government of Kenya (GoK). (2012). Kenya Open Data. Nairobi: Government of Kenya.
Google Scholar
9
-
Hwang, S., Kil, J., Lee, C. W., & Kim, Y. (2013). Distribution and host plants of parasitic weed Cuscuta pentagona Engelm. Korean Journal of Plant Resources, 26(2), 289–302. https://doi.org/10.7732/kjpr.2013.26.2.289.
Google Scholar
10
-
Kaiser, B., Vogg, G., Fürst, U. B., & Albert, M. (2015). Parasitic plants of the genus Cuscuta and their interaction with susceptible and resistant host plants. Frontiers in Plant Science, 6, 45. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.00045.
Google Scholar
11
-
Kenya National Beaureu of Statistics (KNBS). (2010). 2009 Kenya Population and housing census: Volume 1B population distribution by political units. Nairobi: KNBS.
Google Scholar
12
-
Khalik Abdel, K. N. (2006). Seed morphology of Cuscuta L. (Convolvu-laceae) in Egypt and its systematic significance. Feddes Repertorium, 117(August), 217–224. https://doi.org/10.1002/fedr.200511100.
Google Scholar
13
-
Kumari, P., Tiwari, S. K., & Choudhary, A. K. (2017). Host range, anatomy, biochemistry and impacts of Cuscuta reflexa Roxb.: A case study from the Betla National Park, Jharkhand, India. Tropical Plant Research, 4(1), 95–102. https://doi.org/10.22271/tpr.2017.v4.i1.014.
Google Scholar
14
-
Lanini, W. T., & Kogan, M. (2005). Biology and management of Cuscuta in crops. Ciencia e Investigación Agraria, 32, 127–141.
Google Scholar
15
-
Mishra, J. S. (2009). Biology and management of Cuscuta species. Indian Journal of Weed Science, 41(1 and 2), 1–11.
Google Scholar
16
-
Mukhtar Irum, K. I., & M., S. (2011). Cuscuta campestris Yunck., A New Pest of Capsicum Frutescens L. (Hot Chilli) In Lahore-Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Weed Science Research, 17(1), 103–110.
Google Scholar
17
-
Olszewski, M., Dilliott, M., Garcı´a-Ruiz,´ I., & Bendarvandi B, C. M. (2020). Cuscuta seeds: Diversity and evolution, value for systematics/identification and exploration of allometric relationships. PLoS ONE, 15(6), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234627.
Google Scholar
18
-
Prenner, G., D., G., & H., P. (2002). Floral development and morphology in Cuscuta reflexa RoxB. (Convolvulaceae). Stapfia, 80(May), 311–322.
Google Scholar
19
-
Riviere, S., & Riviere, S. (2013). Morphology, Structure, Function and Evolution of Infrastaminal Scales in Cuscuta (Convolvulaceae). Wilfrid Laurier University.
Google Scholar
20
-
Sharma, Y. P., & Kapoor, V. (2014). Parasitic angiosperms and biology of Cuscuta Species – An Overview. Indian Society of Mycology and Plant Pathology Scientific Publishers, 6(January), 577–608.
Google Scholar
21
-
Stefanovi´ c, S., Kuzmina, M., & Costea, M. (2007). Delimitation of major lineages within Cuscuta subgenus Grammica (Convolvulaceae) using plastid and nuclear DNA sequences. American Journal of Botany, 94(4), 568–589. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.94.4.568.
Google Scholar
22
-
Tada, Y., Sugai, M., & Furuhashi, K. (1996a). Haustoria of Cuscuta japonica, a holoparasitic flowering plant, are induced by the cooperative effects of far-red light and tactile stimuli. Plant and Cell Physiology, 38(8), 1049–1053.
Google Scholar
23
-
Tada, Y., Sugai, M., & Furuhashi, K. (1996b). Haustoria of Cuscuta japonica, a holoparasitic flowering plant, are induced by the cooperative effects of far-red light and tactile stimuli. Plant and Cell Physiology, 37(8), 1049–1053.
Google Scholar
24
-
UNESCO. (1977). FAO-UNESCO Soil Map of the World, vol. VI. Africa. Paris: UNESCO.
Google Scholar
25
-
Verma, N., & Yadav, R. K. (2018). Cuscuta reflexa : A Parasitic Medicinal Plant, 18(2):1938–1942.
Google Scholar
26
-
Welsh Mark, S. S., & C., M. (2010). Pollen evolution and its taxonomic significance in Cuscuta (dodders, Convolvulaceae). Plant Sys, 285, 83–101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-009-0259-4.
Google Scholar
27
-
Wright, M. A. R., Ianni, M. D., & Costea, M. (2012). Diversity and evolution of pollen-ovule production in Cuscuta (dodders, Convolvulaceae) in relation to floral morphology. Plant Systematics and Evolution, 298(2), 369–389. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-01.
Google Scholar
28
-
Yuncker, T. G. (1932). The genus Cuscuta. Memoirs of the Torrey Botanical Club, 18(2), 109–331.
Google Scholar
29